Description: Criteria Area Species Survey AreasSpecies of Concern Area ID:Area 1: Brodiaea filifolia, Atriplex serenana var.davidsonil, Atriplex parishii, Centromadia pungens ssp laevis, Erodium macrophyllum, Lasthenia glabrata var.coulter, Myosurus minimusArea 2: Atriplex coronata var. natatior, Atriplex parishii, Atriplex serenana var. davidsonii, Brodiaea filifolia, Erodium macrophyllum, Centromadia pengens ssp. laevis, Lasthenia glabrata var. coulteri, Myosurus minimusArea 3: Atriplex cononata var. natatior, Atriplex parishii, Atriplex serenana var. davidsonii, Brodiaea filifolia, Centromadia pungens ssp. laevis, Erodium macrophyllum, Lasthenia glabrata ssp. couteri, Myosurus minimus, Nama stenocarpumArea 3a (9): Atriplex coronata var. natatior, Atriplex parishii, Atriplex serenana var. davidsonii, Brodiaea filifolia, Centromadia pungens ssp. laevis, Erodium macrophyllum, Lasthenia glabrata ssp. couteri, Myosurus minimus, Nama stenocarpumArea 4: Atriples serenana var. davidsonii, Atriplex parishii, Brodiaea filifolia, Centromadia pungens ssp. laevis, Erodium macrophyllum, Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri, Myosurus minimusArea 5: Berberis nevinii, Ceanothus ophiochilus, Erodium macrophyllumArea 6: Berberis nevinii, Centromadkia pungens var. laevis, Erodium macrophyllumArea 7: Antriplex serenana var. davidsonii, Atriplex parishii, Erodium macrophyllum, Lasthenia glabrata var. couteri, Lepechinia cardiophylla, Navarretia prostrataArea 8: Lepechinia cardiophyllaNOTE: There was a slight discrepancy between the display of these codes in the database as compared to the adopted map. Area 3a as identified on the map is designated as area 9 in the database. This metadata reflects the codes displayed on the adopted map.NOTE: The County believes that these species reflect current information as described in the ERRATA to the MSHCP 8/9/2004, but has not formally received or accepted the data as a deliverabel.This layer was named WRC_SSA_CASPC, and was changed to current name on 02/27/2015.
Description: WMSHCP Mammal Species Survey AreasMammal Survey Areas by Species:Mammal Code 1 = Aguanga kangaroo rat and L.A. pocket mouseMammal Code 2 = L. A. pocket mouse onlyMammal Code 3 = San Bernardino kangaroo rat and L.A. pocket mouse
Description: MSHCP Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas (NEPSSA)These survey areas were identified based on the presence of select soils, existing occurrence data for Narrow Endemic Plant Species (UC Riverside database and CNDDB), personal communication with the USFWS and Fred Roberts. Select soils were digitized from 1971 Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey (Knecht 1971). SPECIES OF CONCERN AREA ID:AREA 1: Allium munzii, Ambrosia pumila, Dodecahema leptoceras, Dudleya multicaulisAREA 2: Allium munzii, Ambrosia pumila, Dudleya multicaulis, Orcuttia californica, Trichocoronis wrightii var wrightiiAREA 3: Navarretia fossalis, Orcuttia californica, Trichocoronis wrightii var wrightiiAREA 3a: Navarretia fossalis, Orcuttia californica, Trichocoronis wrightii var wrightiiAREA 4: Allium munzii, Orcuttia californicaAREA 5: Dodecahema leptocerasAREA 6: Arabis johnstonii, Calochortus palmeri var. munzii, Galium angustifolium ssp. jacinticumAREA 7: Phacelia stelllarisAREA 8: Allium marviniiAREA 9: Dudleya multicaulis, Satureja chandleri, Sibaropsis hammittii
Description: This data set of polygon features represents Riverside County's desert tortoise area. Data was spatially adjusted in 2020UNIT_NAME: Name of desert tortoise areas
Description: This data set of polygon features represents the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat plan and fee area within Riverside County. Data was spatially adjusted in 2020.
Description: This data set of polygon features represents Stephen's Kangaroo Rat habitat within Riverside County. See attached documentation for habitat classification descriptions.
Description: This data set is a product of the final reconciled version of the PQP (Public/Quasi-Public Conserved Lands) and is a working copy of the baseline information, which will periodically be updated to correct inconsistencies, erroneous inclusions or results of required PQP replacement.The reconciliation was the result of a long term verification process to establish an accurate baseline for lands held in conservation. Efforts to begin the verification of this data set began in 2006 in order to meet the requirements of the MSHCP, which states that within five years of pemit issuance, the RCA shall verify the precise agreage,location amount and status of PQP lands in the MSHCP conservation area. Efforts were delayed however, when questions arose from the Wildlife Agencies as to whether particular properties were considered PQP or Additional Reserve Lands in the original baseline data as depicted on the PQP map at the time of adoption. Discussions culminated in a minor amendment adjustment (MA 2007-01) where these issues were adressed and finalized and the PQP reconciliation process resumed, verifying and authenticating inclusions. The timeline of PQP reconciliation was additionally compromised by the lack of prompt responses from partner agencies and special districts. During the 2010 calendar year, RCA made considerable headway in the PQP reconciliation process by completing the review of public/quasi-public lands within all of the cities and determined the status of these lands using accessible sources. In cases where there was no response from the individual entity, assessment was made with as much accuracy as possible expending input from local knowledge and prior designations. County departments were reviewed including Flood, Waste, Parks and RCTC. Federal and State properites were completed using current ownership as well as other sources when determining consistency of conserved land activities. BLM maps, numerous websites and the Wildlife Conservation Board were also utilized in the analysis. Properties managed or owned by environmental agencies were evaluated, such as the Center for Land Management and Riverside Land Conservancy and the preparation for proposed MOU's began. Comparisons were also made to other existing conserved land databases.When the initial review was complete, acreage assessments were made and it was determined that there was a need to add properties to establish the 347,000 acre base. The procedure to include other reviewed and qualified conserved lands is as follows: 1: Add in all additional State and Federal Lands within Rough Step Unit 9, 2: Add in all additional State and Federal Lands within Rough Step 4 not in criteria cells, 3: Add in all additional State and Federal Lands within Rough Step 2 not in criteria cells, 4: Add in selected State and Federal Lands within other Rough Step Units as needed, 5: Consider County (ie Parks, Flood Control etc) Water Districs and other quailfied lands not in criteria cells.This process was followed until the acreage threshold was met.There are inclusions in this database where status is yet to be determined. These properties are marked as 'Pending' in the Final Status field .They are currently unresolved until funding source questions for the OHV park and issue of BLM exchange parcels are resolved. Acreage for these properties have not been included in the required 347,000 acres to ensure appropriate coverage. A draft distribution of the reconciled version of Public/Quasi-Public land was sent to the Wildlife agencies for review in October 2011. This review led to sereral changes before being finalized by the agencies on July 19, 2012. Inspection of the PQP baseline data led to additional analysis of public ownership information. Consequently, supplemental properties were identified as appearing to meet the criteria for additional public/quasi-public conserved lands. These properties were documented, put in a GIS data layer, and set aside for further review.
Description: 2020 Spatial AdjustmentThis is the boundary layer of the Mulit-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Western MSHCP boundary also used for Western MSHCP Open Space Fee Area. Per Ord. 810, Sec 8.Section 8. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee Area Boundary. The boundary of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee Area is the same as the MSHCP boundary as set forth in that document entitled MSHCP Plan Area Map dated June 2003, which is on file with the Clerk of the Board.